Re: m-tx_0.60d-5.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi Roland, hi Peter,
Sorry for not answering before, I gave my implicite NMU agreement
by not rejecting, but should have made this more clear.
On So, 05 Mai 2013, Roland Stigge wrote:
> * Filing a bug describing the problem first.
That was done.
> * Contacting the maintainers of the package - the current state may
> have a reason.
Was discussed briefly on the ML (which, btw, is the maintainer, not me)
> * Closing the respective bug in the NMU changelog
That was missed
> * Attaching the NMU diff to the BTS
That, too.
> Since you did nothing from this list, I guess sth. went wrong here.
Nothing serious besides that due to the above two facts I didn't
realize that the upload will be based on .5 insteadof the version
in experimental ...
> Maybe I missed something since Norbert took over maintainership for
> m-tx (including some musixtex related packages). So did you coordinate
> (Peter and Norbert)? Otherwise I would be forced to revert the changes
> of m-tx 0.60d-5.1 and ask you to not do like this again. (Actually,
> the version from experimental should just be moved to unstable now
> that wheezy is released. - Norbert?)
Please leave it like it is, I will upload a new version based on the one
from experimental and include the changes Peter made. They are fine.
Sorry for being late, and thanks for both of your work!
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: