[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706144: marked as done (m-tx has very limited architecture list, making texlive-full uninstallable on many architectures)

Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 09:15:24 +0100
with message-id <5186151C.70402@p10link.net>
and subject line re: m-tx has very limited architecture list, making texlive-full uninstallable on many architectures
has caused the Debian Bug report #706144,
regarding m-tx has very limited architecture list, making texlive-full uninstallable on many architectures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: m-tx
Severity: important
A bug was reported by a raspbian user about texlive-full being uninstable due to m-tx not being available. Taking a closer look revealed that the reason for this was that m-tx declares an explicit architecture list with only a handful of architectures. So texlive-full ends up uninstallable on most debian architectures.
Is there a good reason for this? (for example inline assembly with no generic C implementation available) if so please document what it is in the bug report and if applicable please review the architecture list matches what is currently supported, if not please change the architecture to any.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.60d-5.1

Sorry forgot to include a Closes: in the changelog.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: