Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?

To: debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Cc: preining@logic.at
Subject: Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
From: eythanweg@gmail.com (Eythan Weg)
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:48:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vc71h4rh.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 87ehdqeeus.fsf@riesling.miltenberg.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 20130501184947.GB26057@d-and-j.net> <20130426041211.GA24374@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <874nesgz5d.fsf@riesling.miltenberg.kuesterei.ch> <6A01AC90-79D2-495F-ADAC-9AC060DA6BA3@logic.at> <87ppxekeqh.fsf@gmail.com> <BDC09410-B37A-4DB9-95CE-AC6512F63D41@logic.at> <87k3nmk4fy.fsf@gmail.com> <904A1A5F-2FA9-413F-A4BF-D0E220CFDAE6@logic.at> <[🔎] 87ehdqeeus.fsf@riesling.miltenberg.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 20130502064236.GA9485@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Thu, 2 May 2013 15:42:36 +0900

   
   Of course, if a new package starts to be separately maintained, there
   is some action required from our side, ie. a new texlive upload that
   does not ship the now separately maintained package. But I guess
   this is not happening too often.
   
   All the currently separately maintained packages should *not* conflict
   file-wise wiht TeX Live.
   
   Does this explain my idea better?

Yes, Thank you.
   
   Norbert
   
Eythan

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
  - From: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster)
- Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
  - From: Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
- Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
Next by Date: Bug#706144: marked as done (m-tx has very limited architecture list, making texlive-full uninstallable on many architectures)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] TL2013 and again a new layout?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread