Re: Bug#677202: biber packages version 0.9.9+git2012426-3 is beta and requires beta version of biblatex
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
> > So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an
> > epoch. 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. It seems a shame to
> > introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are
> > going to increase pretty soon beyond the troublesome case.
>
> Thank you for that tip, Julian. Seems like I forgot to add a "0" in
> the ISO date.
>
> I will use version "0.9.9+release-1" for now, and then use "1.0.0"
> with "pre" or "rc" when biblatex is also upgraded.
If you want to do that, remember to use the "~" syntax: 1.0.0~pre1-1
or similar; that way, 1.0.0-1 will be strictly greater than the "pre"
version number!
Julian
Reply to: