Bug#649487: marked as done (detex: segfault with argument "--version")
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:52:21 +0900
with message-id <20120613035221.GB20856@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #649487,
regarding detex: segfault with argument "--version"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
649487: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649487
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: detex: segfault with argument "--version"
- From: Matthew Wakeling <matthew@wakeling.homeip.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:13:19 +0000
- Message-id: <20111121131319.29710.81212.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2009-8
Severity: normal
If I run detex with the argument "--version", then I get:
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - -
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - v
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - r
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - i
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - o
Segmentation fault
While this may seem an odd thing to do, the segfault is worrying, and should be investigated. A locally-compiled version of detex 2.8 downloaded from upstream does not exhibit the same problem - it produces the following:
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - -
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - v
detex: error: -e option requires and argument
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
ii ed 1.4-3 The classic UNIX line editor
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.1 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.4.2-2.1+squeeze1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8 GCC support library
ii libkpathsea5 2009-8 TeX Live: path search library for
ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-5 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpng12-0 1.2.44-1+squeeze1 PNG library - runtime
ii libpoppler5 0.12.4-1.2 PDF rendering library
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-4 GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-4 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.7-1 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library
ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii perl 5.10.1-17squeeze2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii tex-common 2.08.1 common infrastructure for building
ii texlive-common 2009-11 TeX Live: Base component
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
texlive-binaries recommends no packages.
texlive-binaries suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2012.20120530-2
$ detex --version
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - -
detex: warning: unknown option ignored - v
detex: error: -e option requires and argument
$
no segfault, proper warning, closing this bug.
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TORLUNDY (n.) Narrow but thickly grimed strip of floor between the
fridge and the sink unit in the kitchen of a rented flat.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--- End Message ---
Reply to: