On 22.05.12 Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at) wrote:
> On Mi, 16 Mai 2012, Hilmar PreuÃ?e wrote:
Hi,
> > this is a reopening of #668562 and friends. I still found a
> > document, which can be compiled using LaTeX, but not XeLaTeX and
> > it still looks like a problem in xeCJK.sty. Yes, we have a
> > different error message. As the document has non-ASCII chars it
> > is attached.
>
> With the latest updated of xeCJK (now in tlpretest) the document
> can be compiled, but gives a warning:
> ...
> (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty)))
> (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/fontspec/fontspec.cfg))))
> *************************************************
> * xeCJK warning: "no-CJKfamily"
> *
> * It seems that you have not declare a CJKfamily.
> * If you want to use xeCJK in the right way, you should use
> *
> * \xeCJKmainfont[...]{...}
> *
> * in the preamble to declare the main CJKfamily.
> *
> *************************************************
> (./xetex-prob.aux) (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tipa/t3cmr.fd)
> [1] (./xetex-prob.aux) )
> Output written on xetex-prob.pdf (1 page).
> Transcript written on xetex-prob.log.
>
>
> That should close the bug with the next upload, right?
>
At least it shouldn't give an FTBFS any more. If the document has not
the expected content it is a bug in dblatex, b/c it doesn't generate
correct source code.
Many thanks!
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature