[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian packaging of context-doc-nonfree) branch, master, updated. debian/2012.06.27-2-1-gb52f8b4



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit b52f8b46634571b1f020557efad4e57ff6e56848
Author: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Date:   Wed Dec 19 13:48:31 2012 +0900

    ship documentation back in /usr/share/texmf/doc, build-depend on
      tex-common (>= 4.01)
    release to experimental

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d74519f..61c26df 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+context-doc-nonfree (2012.06.27-3) experimental; urgency=low
+
+  * ship documentation back in /usr/share/texmf/doc, build-depend on
+    tex-common (>= 4.01)
+
+ -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>  Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:47:33 +0900
+
 context-doc-nonfree (2012.06.27-2) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * do not ship documentation in /usr/share/texmf/doc, as this is 
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 58cf7c6..c8230b9 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
 Uploaders: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~)
-Build-Depends-Indep: tex-common (>= 2.10)
+Build-Depends-Indep: tex-common (>= 4.01)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 
 Package: context-doc-nonfree
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index a89dc3b..5155323 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -21,9 +21,8 @@ binary-indep: build-indep
 	dh_testroot
 	dh_clean
 	dh_installdirs usr/share/doc/$(package) \
-		usr/share/doc/texmf/context/
-	cp -a base $(instbase)/usr/share/doc/texmf/context/
-	dh_link usr/share/doc/texmf/context/base usr/share/doc/$(package)/base
+		usr/share/texmf/doc/context/
+	cp -a base $(instbase)/usr/share/texmf/doc/context/
 	dh_installdocs
 	dh_installchangelogs
 	dh_compress -X.pdf

-- 
Debian packaging of context-doc-nonfree)


Reply to: