Re: Bug#669003: fontconfig: TEXMF fonts status and activation
Keith,
I just realized that my question originally was different:
On Mo, 16 Apr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> and texmf trees. I see the fontconfig has an interest (trigger)
> in /usr/share/texmf/fonts, but AFAIS an installation into this directory
> does not change anything, which is not surprising since in all of
> /etc/fonts/ and below nothing about texmf is mentioned (besides two
> dirs in avail.d/30-defoma for tex-gyre and lmodern).
That means, if I drop files into /u/s/texmf/fonts, the fc-cache is
recreated, but that does *NOT* include fonts in /u/s/texmf/fonts, since
they are not mentioned in any fontconfig configuration file.
That was one item I wanted to clarify.
On Do, 26 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > - is the current behaviour on purpose, and if yes, why is there
> > > a triggered interest in /usr/share/texmf/fonts?
> >
> > This happened when the triggers mechanism was added; it used to be that
> > fontconfig would rebuild the caches when any fonts were installed.
> >
> > The choice of directories probably reflected an assumption at the time
> > that TeX would eventually use fontconfig to locate fonts.
But since fontconfig config files does not mention these dirs, even *IF*
any engine uses fontconfig, it will not find the fonts, at least
as far as I understand.
Plus the rest from the other email
Sorry for double posting
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DITTISHAM (n.)
Any music you hear on the radio to which you have to listen very
carefully to determine whether it is an advertising jingle or a bona
fide record.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: