# Bug#671624: workaround

```On 06.05.12 marc.carter-ceqosy2@cool.fr.nf (marc.carter-ceqosy2@cool.fr.nf) wrote:

Hi,

> > After exchanging both \usepackage commands the minimal example
> > compiles fine.  Could you confirm if the document generates the
> > expected results?
>
> Indeed, swapping the two \usepackage statements works.  Thanks for the
> workaround!
>
> Ultimatetly this is still a bug to fix though, IMO.  The workaround
> is not easy to discover.  In fact, the original document had many
> \usepackage statements, and it took some effort just to discover
> which two packages were in conflict.  Minimally, I would expect the
>
Sorry, from time to time it happens that the load order *does*
matter.  A prominent example is hyperref (IIRC).  If you can proof