[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564217: marked as done (would have needed to wait for texlive2009 in testing)

Your message dated Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:43:16 +0100
with message-id <20101128204316.GA4619@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#564217: [luatex] unresolvable dependency cycle
has caused the Debian Bug report #564217,
regarding would have needed to wait for texlive2009 in testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
564217: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: luatex
Version: 0.50.0-1
Severity: serious

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Steps to reproduce.
        1. context (2008.05.21-1) is installed, depends on texlive-base-bin 
(>= 2007) and recommends luatex (any).
        2. luatex (0.28.0-2) got installed.
        3. luatex (0.50.0-1) became available, collides with texlive-base-bin 
(< 2008).
        4. Only texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) is available.

Results in the following cycle (default solution):
        1. Downgrade texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) to 
(2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1).
        2. Upgrade texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1) to texlive-base-bin 
(2007.dfsg.2-8).
        3. Go to 1.

Alternative solution:
        a) remove luatex and
        b) keep texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) and
        c) keep texlive-luatex [(not installed) and
        d) ignore context recommends luatex

texlive-binaries seems to be involved as the provider of a virtual package.

Both solutions aren't prefect.
Can you resolve this issue?

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:       Linux 2.6.32.3

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  990 testing         security.debian.org 
  990 testing         ftp.uni-kl.de 
  990 testing         ftp.de.debian.org 
   50 unstable        ftp.uni-kl.de 
   50 unstable        ftp.de.debian.org 
   50 stable          volatile.debian.org 
   50 stable          security.debian.org 
   50 stable          ftp.uni-kl.de 
   50 stable          ftp.de.debian.org 
   50 experimental    ftp.uni-kl.de 
   50 experimental    ftp.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends                  (Version) | Installed
==================================-+-==============
libc6                   (>= 2.7-1) | 2.10.2-2
libgcc1               (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.4.2-8
libpng12-0           (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.41-1
libpoppler3                        | 0.8.7-3
libstdc++6              (>= 4.1.1) | 4.4.2-8
zlib1g                (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
texlive-base-bin                   | 2007.dfsg.2-8
texlive-base                       | 2007.dfsg.2-4

Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 08.01.10 Daniel Herzog (herzog@luftgetrock.net) wrote:

Hi Daniel,

> Package: luatex
> Version: 0.50.0-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> 
> Steps to reproduce.
>         1. context (2008.05.21-1) is installed, depends on texlive-base-bin 
> (>= 2007) and recommends luatex (any).
>         2. luatex (0.28.0-2) got installed.
>         3. luatex (0.50.0-1) became available, collides with texlive-base-bin 
> (< 2008).
>         4. Only texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) is available.
> 
> Results in the following cycle (default solution):
>         1. Downgrade texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) to 
> (2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1).
>         2. Upgrade texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny1) to texlive-base-bin 
> (2007.dfsg.2-8).
>         3. Go to 1.
> 
> Alternative solution:
>         a) remove luatex and
>         b) keep texlive-base-bin (2007.dfsg.2-8) and
>         c) keep texlive-luatex [(not installed) and
>         d) ignore context recommends luatex
> 
> texlive-binaries seems to be involved as the provider of a virtual package.
> 
> Both solutions aren't prefect.
> Can you resolve this issue?
> 
AFAICT that report is only valid as long as TL 2009 is not in
testing. TL 2009 is in testing for a while, can we close that bug?

No reaction for half a year and bug probably obsolete -> closing.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault

--- End Message ---
Reply to: