On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:18:03 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Julien, hi all, > > On Sa, 11 Sep 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > texlive-extra 2009-10 > > > > > > * add the forgotten epoch for musixtex dependency (Closes: #587746) > > > > > > This chnage is trivail, it only adds the forgotten epco to musixtex > > > dependency, which was not included in the upload before. It is not > > > aserious issue, since there are no other musixtex packages around > > > anyway. > > > > > If there's likely to be other changes before release I'd rather defer > > this. Otherwise go ahead. > > Currently I have nothing in the queue, but if you want I can still wait > a bit. > Whichever you prefer, I don't mind. > > > texlive-base 2009-11 > > > > > > * texlive-base conflict with texlive-base-bin-doc to get it removed > > > (Closes: #589205) > > > * avoid unneeded 10texlive-base.cnfpre-edit files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d, > > > thanks Jörg-Volker Peetz (Closes: #584950) > > > > > > The first item is harmless, more important is the second. > > > > > I don't understand the rationale for the first item. If the old package > > is not doing any actual harm then conflicting with it isn't necessary. > > Yes that is true, but it duplicates information in a way that one might > believe there is telxive-base-bin and the binaries. The very same docs > are shipped now in different packages, so yes, in principle it should > not harm, but we did it for cleaning up the upgrade 2007->2009. > > If you prefer I can revert it. > Conflicts create problems for upgrades so if this is not strictly necessary then yes, please revert it. > > > The code in the texlive-base.postinst in the *current* version in testing > > > now unconditionally edits texlive-base.cnf in place creating a backup > > > file > > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d/texlive-base.cnfpre-edit > > > even if no changes were necessary (i.e., when you have not upgraded all > > > the way from etch). > > > > > > The change in this package no protects this in place editing with > > > a check whether the actual target line really occurs. > > > > > Sounds ok. > > Thanks. > > So I wait for your suggestion regarding the above two points (wait with > texlive-extra, revert the conflict) and will upload. > Thanks for your work. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature