[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#529976: marked as done (luatex: texdoc fails to find pgfmanual as it is zipped)

Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:17:03 +0200
with message-id <20100906091701.GA1540@PC23>
and subject line Re: Bug#529976: texlive-base-bin: texdoc fails to find pgfmanual as it is zipped
has caused the Debian Bug report #529976,
regarding luatex: texdoc fails to find pgfmanual as it is zipped
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
529976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-6

texdoc pgf doesn't work as pgfmanual.pdf has been gzipped.  Is there
any reason why texdoc can't be asked to search for gzipped files in
Debian (even though texlive doesn't do zipped docs)?

Thanks!

   Julian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.40.3-1

On 04.09.10 Julian Gilbey (jdg@debian.org) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:48:55PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 22.05.09 Julian Gilbey (jdg@debian.org) wrote:

Hi,

> > > Package: texlive-base-bin
> > > Version: 2007.dfsg.2-6
> > > 
> > > texdoc pgf doesn't work as pgfmanual.pdf has been gzipped.  Is
> > > there any reason why texdoc can't be asked to search for
> > > gzipped files in Debian (even though texlive doesn't do zipped
> > > docs)?
> > > 
> > That bug seems to be fixed in recent luatex. Could you check that and
> > close it? I'll fix the changelog then.
> 
> It's still a problem in texdoc in texlive-base 2009-10, but for a
> different reason, as reported in bug#591781.  So this bug itself can
> be closed, but the related bug needs to remain open (annoyingly).
> 
Thanks four your reply. I was just wondering, why a bug got the tags
"patch pending" about a year and then nothing happens.

Added bug number in changelog (SVN 4699). Hope this was the right
entry.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault

--- End Message ---
Reply to: