[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#336714: marked as done (tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc)

Your message dated Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:18:10 +0200
with message-id <20100904141810.GA14693@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#336714: tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc
has caused the Debian Bug report #336714,
regarding tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
336714: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336714
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal

When upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-10, I was asked about my changes to
the file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc through ucf. When I asked to see the
differences against my installed version, the diff was against /dev/null
so every line was new.

I did not delete the previous version of this file, and did not even
know it existed. This package or another either removed it or failed
to install it. However, I shouldn't have been asked about it.

thanks
Hamish

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii  dpkg                          1.13.11    package maintenance system for Deb
ii  tex-common                    0.8        Common infrastructure for using an
ii  ucf                           2.003      Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages tetex-base recommends:
pn  tetex-doc                     <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]     1.4.58         Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils               2.15           Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                      1.13.11        package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                        0.2-20         The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                     2.3.5-7        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                   1:4.0.2-2      GCC support library
ii  libice6                   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
pn  libkpathsea4              <none>         (no description available)
ii  libpaper1                 1.1.14-3       Library for handling paper charact
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.8rel-5     PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6                    6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6                4.0.2-2        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libt1-5                   5.1.0-2        Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
pn  libxaw8                   <none>         (no description available)
ii  mime-support              3.35-1         MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
pn  perl                      <none>         (no description available)
ii  sed                       4.1.4-4        The GNU sed stream editor
ii  ucf                       2.003          Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.3-6      compression library - runtime

Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii  dpkg                          1.13.11    package maintenance system for Deb
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
ii  ucf                           2.003      Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information:
  tetex-bin/updmap-failed:
  tetex-bin/hyphen: french[=patois], ngerman[=naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung]
  tetex-base/olddat: true
  tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
  tetex-base/fmtutil-failed:
  tetex-base/oldupdm:
  tetex-bin/upd_map: true
  tetex-bin/cnf_name:
  tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
  tetex-base/updmap-failed:
  tetex-bin/use_debconf: false
  tetex-bin/fmtutil-failed:
  tetex-bin/groupname: users
  tetex-bin/userperm: false
  tetex-bin/groupperm: true
  tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 01.11.05 Hamish Moffatt (hamish@debian.org) wrote:

> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0-10
> Severity: normal
> 
> When upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-10, I was asked about my changes to
> the file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc through ucf. When I asked to see the
> differences against my installed version, the diff was against /dev/null
> so every line was new.
> 
> I did not delete the previous version of this file, and did not even
> know it existed. This package or another either removed it or failed
> to install it. However, I shouldn't have been asked about it.
> 
You filed that bug 5 years ago. Frank searched a while for the
problem cause but didn't find anything. Finally we tagged it
unreproducible.

teTeX base exists only in oldstable, is an transitional package in
stable and gone in unstable. I suggest to close that bug now as
probably nobody else will see it and we won't be able to debug it
further.

-> Closing after speaking to the submitter

H.
-- 
sigfault

--- End Message ---
Reply to: