[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#336714: tetex-base: asked about upgrade of previously non-existent conffile /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc



On 01.11.05 Hamish Moffatt (hamish@debian.org) wrote:

Dear Hamish,

> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0-10
> Severity: normal
> 
> When upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-10, I was asked about my changes to
> the file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc through ucf. When I asked to see the
> differences against my installed version, the diff was against /dev/null
> so every line was new.
> 
> I did not delete the previous version of this file, and did not even
> know it existed. This package or another either removed it or failed
> to install it. However, I shouldn't have been asked about it.
> 
You filed that bug 5 years ago. Frank searched a while for the
problem cause but didn't find anything. Finally we tagged it
unreproducible.

teTeX base exists only in oldstable, is an transitional package in
stable and gone in unstable. I suggest to close that bug now as
probably nobody else will see it and we won't be able to debug it
further.

What do you think?

Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: