Re: Processed (with 1 errors): bug house keeping
On Mi, 10 Jun 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > merge 531595 531569
> Bug#531569: The five years old bug...
> Bug#531595: texlive-latex-base: Package fails to install in etch
> Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
> Values for `package' don't match:
> #531569 has `tetex-bin';
> #531595 has `texlive-base-bin'
Yup, anyone having an idea? Should we leave that bug assigned to
tetex-bin because in old-stable there is actually a bug in tetex-bin,
while now that is all in texlive-base-bin?
I leave them separate for now and close both in the texlive-bin package.
But aehm, that doesn't work, because tetex-bin is build grom
texlive-base.
Bummer. Suggestions?
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WINSTON-SALEM (n.)
A person in a restaurant who suggest to their companions that they
should split the cost of the meal equally, and then orders two packets
of cigarettes on the bill.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: