Bug#530832: marked as done (buildds using unauthenticated packages)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:15:43 +0200
with message-id <87skie4hls.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#531581: Critical problems on hppa and ia64 buildds
has caused the Debian Bug report #530832,
regarding buildds using unauthenticated packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
530832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: fails to remove: attempted use of update-texmf-config in postrm.
- From: lamont@debian.org
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:35:57 -0600
- Message-id: <20090528063557.GN30499@mix.mmjgroup.com>
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild settroubleshoot:
> Automatic build of setroubleshoot_2.1.11-1 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20090525-0351
[...]
> Removing texlive-base ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-base.postrm: line 124: update-texmf-config: command not found
> dpkg: error processing texlive-base (--remove):
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> texlive-base
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> apt-get failed.
[...]
A full log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=setroubleshoot&ver=2.1.11-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> wrote:
> Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Except for arguing, mixing (non?) bugs and resisting to upload an easy
>>> workaround might have made things worse btw...
>>
>> And that easy workaround would be???
>
> To only conditionaly use a command that seems to not always be available.
COULD YOU PLEASE START READING WHAT WE ARE WRITING?
texlive-base's postrm, upon REMOVE, uses a command from tex-common, on
which it already DEPENDS. This is allowed by policy.
The fact that in this particular chroot, texlive-base was installed
without tex-common being installed, or even unpacked, is NOT A BUG OF
tex-common.
It seems it is a bug of policy, or dpkg.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--- End Message ---
Reply to: