Bug#563040: [texlive-base] SIunits and ams* do not work together - misleading help?
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2009-6
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
If I try to use "amsfonts" together with "SIunits", pdflatex gives me an
error, that these cannot be used together
! Package SIunits Error: The command \square was already defined.
(SIunits) Possibly due to the amssymb package.
It then says
Hint: use option `amssymb' or `squaren' with SIunits package.
See SIunits.dvi or readme.txt section: Known problems and limitations.
Note, that it already thinks, that I am using "amssymb" in the error message
above. Using the amssymb package does not change anything and squaren.sty
is not available in Debian.
Is that a bug or just one of the inconveniences that come with the texlive
complexity?
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-fs
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstable www.debian-multimedia.org
500 unstable ftp2.de.debian.org
1 experimental ftp2.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
==================================-+-==============
texlive-doc-base (>= 2009-1) | 2009-2
mime-support | 3.48-1
dpkg (>= 1.14.18) | 1.15.5.5
dpkg (>= 1.15.4) | 1.15.5.5
OR install-info | 4.13a.dfsg.1-5
tex-common (>= 2.00) | 2.05
luatex (>= 0.46.0-5) | 0.50.0-1
texlive-common (>= 2009-1) | 2009-6
texlive-binaries (>= 2009-1) | 2009-5
debconf (>= 0.5) | 1.5.28
OR debconf-2.0 |
ucf | 3.0025
debconf (>= 1.4.69) | 1.5.28
OR cdebconf (>= 0.39) |
dpkg (>= 1.14.18) | 1.15.5.5
Package Status (Version) | Installed
=============================-+-===========
tetex-bin |
tetex-base |
tetex-extra |
tex-common | 2.05
Recommends (Version) | Installed
============================-+-==============
lmodern (>= 0.93.3-1) | 2.004.1-3
Suggests (Version) | Installed
================================-+-===========
perl-tk |
ghostscript | 8.70~dfsg-2
xpdf-reader |
OR pdf-viewer |
gv |
OR postscript-viewer |
debhelper (>= 7.0.8) | 7.4.10
--- Output from package bug script ---
Reply to: