[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#512903: tex-common - Fails on purge: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 20



Package: tex-common
Version: 1.11.3
Severity: serious

> Automatic build of tuxguitar_1.0.dak-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> Selecting previously deselected package tex-common.
> Unpacking tex-common (from .../tex-common_1.11.3_all.deb) ...
> Setting up tex-common (1.11.3) ...
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/15Plain.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/65BibTeX.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90TeXDoc.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
> 
> Creating config file /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg with new version
> *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
>              the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
>              script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
>              and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
>              old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
> 
>              Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
[...]
> Removing tex-common ...
> Purging configuration files for tex-common ...
> dpkg: error processing tex-common (--purge):
>  subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 20

Bastian



Reply to: