Bug#486369: bug cleanup (was: Bug#486369: tex-common: manpages refer to teTeX)

[Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>]

clone 486369 -1
retitle -1 tex-common: teTeX-specific code should be removed
thanks

While cleaning up old e-mails still marked as "do something!"...

Frank

Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

> On 15.06.08 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
>
>> Package: tex-common
>> Version: 1.10
>> Severity: normal
>> 
>> For example:
>> 
>> ,---- update-texmf(8)
>> | SEE ALSO
>> |        Further information can be found in /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/README.Debian.gz
>> | 
>> `----
>> 
> Which leads me to the questtion, what we still need.
>
> - debian/postinst.in reads:
>
> This file is no longer used and has therefore been renamed by the
> postinst script of the tetex-base package.
> -> keep
>
> Further down it checks the old teTeX texmf-tree:
>
>     check_texmf /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf TEXMFDIST \
>
> '/usr/share/texmf-{tetex,texlive}|/usr/share/texmf-{texlive,tetex}|/usr/share/texmf-texlive'
>     check_texmf /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf TEXMFDIST \
>
> '/usr/share/texmf-{tetex,texlive}|/usr/share/texmf-{texlive,tetex}|/usr/share/texmf-texlive'
>
> As tex-common conflicts with tetex-base that dirs should be gone,
> when we come to this part of the installation.
>
> - debian/preinst.in should be cleaned after etch as it might be
>   needed for upgrade
> - in debian/common.functions.in some functions have "tetex" in the
>   name and a lot of md5sums from old teTeX files, but this does not
>   hurt
> - /usr/share/texmf-tetex/ is still listed in the Policy and the
>   package tetex-bin is listed
> - same for doc/TeX-on-Debian.sgml
> - update-updmap.1 and update-texmf.8 (see above)
> - tpm2licenses(.README)
>
> H.
> -- 
> sigmentation fault

-- 
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg