[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#452582: texinfo: Funny man page for texi2dvi



Package: texinfo
Version: 4.11.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal

Hello,

The man page for texi2dvi is funny.  My favorite sentence is "The full
documentation for You is maintained as a Texinfo manual." (:

Thank you,
	Ken

YOU(1)                           User Commands                          YOU(1)



NAME
       You - convert Texinfo documents to DVI

DESCRIPTION
       You  don't have a working TeX binary installed, but the texi2dvi script
       can't proceed without it. If you want to use this script, you  have  to
       install some kind of TeX, for example TeX Live Debian packages. You can
       do that with this command:

              apt-get install texlive

       can't proceed without it. If you want to use this script, you  have  to
       install some kind of TeX, for example TeX Live Debian packages. You can
       do that with this command:

              apt-get install texlive

SEE ALSO
       The full documentation for You is maintained as a Texinfo  manual.   If
       the info and You programs are properly installed at your site, the com-
       mand

              info You

       should give you access to the complete manual.



You don't have a working TeX binaNovemberl2007 but the texi2dvi script  YOU(1)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages texinfo depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.6.1-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries

texinfo recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
One potato, two potato, three potato, four.
Five potato, six potato, seven potato, more.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: