Bug#430828: luatex-snapshot: Fails to create format
Hi all!
On Mit, 27 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> Did you try on amd64, or your own build on i386? If the latter, which
i386.
> version of zlib1g-dev was used for building?
1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-2
> >> ii libc6 2.5-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> >> ii texlive-base-bin 2007-3 TeX Live: Essential binaries
>
> Why does it not depend on zlib1g, when it build-depends on zlib1g-dev?
This is the magic dh_shlibdeps, don't ask me why it didn't find this
dependency.
The control file contains:
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin
(btw, should change this!) but dh_shlibdeps didn't add zlib. Strange.
On Mit, 27 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> lua_pushfstring(L, "zlib library version does not match - header: %s, library: %s", ZLIB_VERSION, version);
> Hm, does this make sense? Shouldn't libtool, proper dependencies and,
> in an ideal world, versioned symbols be used for such checks?
Umpf. Grr. Tsmmmmmm.
> Or should the zlib authors be lart^w politely critized to not use a
> forth level of numbering beyond REVISION?
Wellll, yes. But no idea. This is out of my abilities (esp. with 3
aperitives intus)
> Is it safe to assume that the authors of lzlib.c are just over-careful,
> and we can replace the hardcoded version with our current one (after
> checking that the shlibs information for zlib didn't change, of course)?
?? I don't understand what you mean, but this is probably a consequence
of the level of alcohol in my blood.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily
escaped the chronicler's mind.
--- This line perhaps best sums up the whole book.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Reply to: