Re: Upload targeting at testing
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I guess we should get texlive 2007 into testing. The last
> texlive/tex-common bug report (grave) in testing showed that we have
> moved far enough now ;-)
Just for the record, we could also solve this by uploading tex-common
with high urgency and the update-tetex-bin script...
> Checking the RC bugs we have:
> texlive-lang: 429257 Arabicore/arabicore
> already fixed
>
> texlive-base:
> 427859 lmodern fails to configure
> already fixed in depot
> 429716 tetex-bin postinst fails in lenny ...
> fixed with upload of all texlive2007 with accomp. tetex
> 429753 texlive 2005 cannot be installed due to missing
> update-tetex-whatever script we don't ship anymore
> closed with upload/transit to testing
> 427774 update-alternatives fails in tetex-bin 3
> only present in tetex << 2007
> 421643 our dummy bug
>
> plus the etch-ignore bugs, do they appply for lenny transitions???
They do, but their number is either the same before and after the
transition, or the counting is wrong - which we'd see and can tweak.
> The last thing we could do to blacklist csplain etc...
That could also be done later.
> Comments? Work distribution?
>
> I suggest uploading
> texlive-bin
> texlive-base
> texlive-lang
> and maybe
> texlive-extra (closes one bug)
> (texlive-doc don't need an upload I would say)
tex-common should also be uploaded, although it doesn't touch the
important bugs.
Give me until this afternoon for testing, please.
> KANTURK (n.)
> An extremely intricate knot originally used for belaying the
> topgallant foresheets of a gaff-rigged China clipper, and now more
> commonly observed when trying to get an old kite out of the cupboard
> under the stairs.
I like that one. Reminds me that I should get one more Jack Aubrey
novel for our holiday weeks in July...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: