[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#447559: [dev-context] Bug#447559: chemtex is broken again



Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 16:18 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Norbert Preining wrote:
forwarded 447559 dev-context@ntg.nl
thanks

Hi Hans, hi all!

We got the following bug report for the Debian package, but I guess that
should be fixed upstream:
for latex, ppchtex is loaded via ppchtex.noc which says ...

\let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded

\input supp-mis.tex  \let\writestatus\undefined
\input syst-gen.tex
\input syst-fnt.tex

\let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded

(\unexpanded is an etex primitive but context had an \unexpanded before etex came around; same for \protected as primitive; so here we push and pop the meanings)

so, i wonder if this user loads ppchtex in the right way

(maybe i should make a derived version for latex usage - given that there are users - in which case i can also cleanup and optimize the context variant, but it has low priotity)

OK I got like two reports from different users who exactly had the same
problem.

One fixed it by simply inputting everythin in the .tex file:

\input supp-mis.tex \input syst-gen.tex
\input syst-fnt.tex
\input m-pictex.tex
\input m-ch-en.tex

the other removed the lines

\let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded
\let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded

from ppchtex.nox .

Then it worked for both.

So whatever you do please fix it as it is a bug that does not only annoy
me or alternatively tell us please how to correctly use m-ch-en ...

well, does the

\let\normalunexpanded\unexpanded

\input supp-mis.tex  \let\writestatus\undefined
\input syst-gen.tex
\input syst-fnt.tex

\let\unexpanded\normalunexpanded

method work?

i cannot test it since i only run context

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------




Reply to: