[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427169: tetex-base - update-updmap: cannot read /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg



Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

> But we have to analyze what this would mean, further down:
> clean: unpatch
>         for i in $(PACKAGES) ; do \
>           rm -f debian/$$i.{README.Debian,links,links.generated} ; \
>           rm -f debian/$$i.{postinst,postrm,preinst,prerm} ; \
>           rm -f debian/$$i.{maps,languages,formats} ; \
>         done

$ ls src/Packages/texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/tetex-*
src/Packages/texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/tetex-base.postinst.pre
src/Packages/texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/tetex-bin.NEWS
src/Packages/texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/tetex-extra.NEWS

So we even do need debhelper calls for tetex-*, just not dh_installtex.

> # would make sense to do?
> 	  "install bug.script and .control"

At least a bit of sense...

> So the most things are useless, what about:
> - change rules.in to have
> 	PACKAGES=<:=$binpackages:>
> 	METAPACKAGES=<:=$metapackages:>
> - call tpm2deb-bin.pl with $(PACKAGES) $(METAPACKAGES)
> - call the long for only for $(PACKAGES)
> - call merge-dist-tree, bug.*, links.dist, README for $(METAPACKAGES)
> - add -N $i for all $(METAPACKAGES) to the dh_installtex call

I think this is a good approach.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Reply to: