Bug#420838: Cleaning generated pk fonts in maintainer scripts
Just forwarding a mail which have marked as "unread" for ages, so that
it won't be completely forgotten.
--- Begin Message ---
[Darn it's late. Why do good parties always have to start after
From: Florent Rougon <email@example.com>
> Frank Küster <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > - clean up the files in each $TEXMFVAR/fonts directory below /home/.
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, or even allowed by policy
> I'm pretty sure it is not allowed. Users could well get pissed off if
> something in their home directory was changed without their consent.
I also have this problem: the old cjk-latex package depended on TFM
fonts. When using xdvi or dvips, MakeTeXPK would make the necessary
The newest version of latex-cjk depends on Type1 fonts and doesn't
need any PK fonts. However, several of these old PK fonts are still
in ~/.texmf-var/ (or perhaps even /var/cache/fonts/). This causes the
LaTeX process to fail.
If I could point you to bug #406701
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406701), where a
user had problems processing a CJK LaTeX file because he had such
remnants in ~/.texmf-var/fonts/.
I've written a note about this, in tempore non suspecto, in the
README.Debian in latex-cjk telling users to remove these PK fonts, but
I'm afraid few people actually read it.
cjk-latex doesn't have a huge user base ATM, so I could probably deal
with individual bug reports. But a more structural solution would be
preferable. Perhaps writing a debconf warning with big fat red
exclamation marks for packages which have to deal with old PK fonts?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
--- End Message ---
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)