[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#419987:



* Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch> [070420 10:30]:
> Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> 
> > * Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> [070420 09:20]:
> >> Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Couldn't texlive-base-bin conflict with xmltex?
> >> 
> >> Of course not, since that would mean that xmltex isn't installable any
> >> more - there's no other TeX system in sid.
> >
> > Citing from the xmltex package:
> > "XMLTeX is a non-validating, namespace-aware XML parser written in TeX.
> > It allows TeX to directly process XML files."
> >
> > Usually I process tex files with TeX, not XML files. So I figured I
> > don't need xmltex. Did I miss something, like texlive converts every
> > tex/latex file into XML and then uses xmltex?
> 
> No, why?  What's the problem you are trying to address?  

See bug title.

> Was xmltex
> pulled in by some package which you installed?  

I don't remember this.

> Usually, people who
> don't want xmltex shouldn't install it, but for those who install it on
> purpose, it also needs a working TeX system "underneath".

The problem is, that if you have xmltex installed, an upgrade
from tetex to texlive freezes the system. I think this is worth
addressing quickly, since it is very annoying to have to restart the
system. As I understood from Norberts comment, fixing xmltex might take
a while. So, at present, it would be nice if tex-live-bin would conflict
with xmltex, because it is impossible, as far as I can see, to have both
on the system. Later, of course, this conflict should be removed.

Johannes


> 
> Regards, Frank
> -- 
> Dr. Frank Küster
> Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
> Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

-- 
Dr. Johannes Ranke                 jranke@uni-bremen.de     Key ID: F649AF90
UFT Bremen, Leobenerstr. 1         +49 421 218 8971
D-28359 Bremen                     http://www.uft.uni-bremen.de/chemie/ranke



Reply to: