Re: Bug#394167: texlive-base: please provide eqivalent to prosper
Dear Masayuki!
On Fre, 20 Okt 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> That's a known bug of prosper, merging. I'm also increasing the
> severity to normal: Since teTeX is heavily outdated in etch (and will
> never see a new upstream version again), TeXlive is the TeX system of
> choice for etch, and user requests to allow cooperation should not be
> taken lightly.
I have prepared an NMU which fixes this problem and some minor problems.
The changelog entry:
prosper (1.00.4+cvs.2004.03.29-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* NMU
* add alternative TeX live dependencies (Closes: #349670, #392335,
* #394167)
* update policy to 3.7.2, no changes necessary
* move dpatch and debhelper to Build-Depends
* add a call to dh_installtex which creates the necessary mktexlsr calls
automatically (was missing in the postinst script), remove the postinst
script, it will be generated by dh_installtex, add the necessary
dependencies for tex-common
* remove the versioned dependency on tetex as we also depend on tex-common,
which excludes tetex2.
The source and binary package is avaiable at
deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
deb-src http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
and the source and Release file is signed with my debian key.
Please could you inform us whether it is ok to upload this NMU, whether
you plan to do an upload by yourself? It would be nice to get this into
etch so that etch people can use prosper with TeX live.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KNOPTOFT (n.)
The mysterious fluff placed in your pockets by dry-cleaning firms.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: