Re: Bug mass filling
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> I have just run lintian on all the archive (amd64) for both binaries and
> sources, and the results are a bit scary. It looks like a lot of
> maintainers are uploading their packages, and don't really care with the
> policy.
>
> Maybe some errors (E:) of lintian could be changed to critical (C:) and
> uploads containing such critical errors be refused by dak? What do you
> think?
>
>
> Among all of the bugs reported by lintian, one concerns a lot of
> packages, the presence of the clean, binary, binary-arch, binary-indep
> and build targets. This is required by both the section 4.9 of the
> policy and the Etch release standards [1]. Here is the list of affected
> packages. What to do with them?
>
[...]
> E: pfb2t1c2pfb source: debian-rules-missing-required-target binary-indep
(The list is large, so the package won't be removed tomorrow...)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: