Changes to TPM files?

[Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>]

Hi Norbert,

how should we handle such patches:

--- LocalTPM/texmf-dist/tpm/metafont.tpm	(Revision 1659)
+++ LocalTPM/texmf-dist/tpm/metafont.tpm	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
     <TPM:Date>2005/04/29 20:38:30</TPM:Date>
     <TPM:Version>5.94a</TPM:Version>
     <TPM:Creator>popineau</TPM:Creator>
-    <TPM:Title>Macro package for TeX (the most popular).</TPM:Title>
+    <TPM:Title>MetaFont: A font definition system.</TPM:Title>
     <TPM:Description></TPM:Description>
     <TPM:Author></TPM:Author>
     <TPM:Size>133037</TPM:Size>

Just apply?  Discuss upstream (well, in this case it's a clear
Copy&Paste bug, but generally?)  Apply and notify upstream?

Here's a similar one, maybe not without discussion:

--- LocalTPM/texmf/tpm/collection-basic.tpm	(Revision 1659)
+++ LocalTPM/texmf/tpm/collection-basic.tpm	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -8,9 +8,8 @@
     <TPM:Creator>rahtz</TPM:Creator>
     <TPM:Title>Essential programs and files</TPM:Title>
     <TPM:Description>
-These files are regarded as basic for any TeX system, covering
-plain TeX macros, Computer Modern fonts, and configuration for common
-drivers.
+These files are basic for any TeX system, covering plain TeX macros,
+Computer Modern fonts, and configuration for common drivers.
     </TPM:Description>
     <TPM:Author></TPM:Author>
     <TPM:Size>1702</TPM:Size>

(I don't think that the phrase "regarded as" makes any sense in this
context, it's just redundant and maybe confusing).

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)