[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#394879: marked as done (tetex-src: shapepar: non-commercial license)



Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:17:58 -0700
with message-id <E1GcIQ2-00053T-9c@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#394879: fixed in tetex-src 3.0.dfsg.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tetex-src
Version: 3.0-2bpo1
Severity: serious
Tags: pending

For the details, see tetex-base's bugs #356853 and #392423.  tetex-src
also has copies of these files.

Regards, Frank

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tetex-src
Source-Version: 3.0.dfsg.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-src, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

latex-source2e-doc_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-src/latex-source2e-doc_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb
tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.diff.gz
tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.dsc
tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb
tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-src/tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 394879@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-src package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:21:20 +0200
Source: tetex-src
Binary: tetex-src latex-source2e-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.dfsg.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description: 
 latex-source2e-doc - source2e.pdf, the documentation of the LaTeX kernel
 tetex-src  - teTeX texmf source files
Closes: 394879
Changes: 
 tetex-src (3.0.dfsg.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream tarball: Remove shapepar.sty and its support files, they
     have a non-commercial license (closes: #394879)
   * Update list of uploaders in debian/control.
   * Set maintainer to the new list
Files: 
 dfa7d28b9ee785f37771e0d0c47f6e94 862 tex extra tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.dsc
 9f0b4b0f3c741201810df5b66a7748fc 56734110 tex extra tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2.orig.tar.gz
 b60088ef79d53a37cb5f90580fd08236 190462 tex extra tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1.diff.gz
 496047976ed60d977bbfecef0acea58f 56559816 tex extra tetex-src_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb
 3c0fc383be3d89d193648fb7ff67c1a7 2611496 tex extra latex-source2e-doc_3.0.dfsg.2-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFPda3+xs9YyJS+hoRAgG8AJ49bwZrLNVNZq6avRO38atZfwJsUgCfR7fk
K5MdJ9uxODLOOK4wI7K21w8=
=lF/+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply to: