Re: Tagging some bugs as fixed
On 21.06.06 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi all,
> > I'd like to tag these bugs as fixed, as the package does not depend
> > on libkpathsea3 any more. Is that correct so far?
> >
> > tags 357266 + fixed
> > tags 357268 + fixed
> > tags 357269 + fixed
> > # the tetex-bin package again provides libkpathsea-dev instead of
> > # libkpathsea4-dev (#354507). Hence the packages just need a
> > # rebuild. A bin-NUM has been triggered and the new packages does
> > # not depend on libkpathsea3. Tagging all three bugs as fixed.
>
> Can't we just close these bugs? In effect, they were solved by
> changes in tetex-bin, and the bin-NMU. So there's little point in
> waiting for these packages' maintainers to "acknowledge the
> bin-NMU".
>
Hmm, correct. There is no further action from the maintainer
necessary.
H.
--
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.
-- Cartoon caption
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: