Re: [tex-live] Proposal for collection reorganization

[Robin Fairbairns <Robin.Fairbairns@cl.cam.ac.uk>]

>     microtype is latex only, or?
> 
> AFAIK yes.
> 
>     Does context have any use of the microtype package?
>     
> I believe it is all built in, somehow.
> 
>     OTOH pdfcprot: Is it used by context? 
> 
> I doubt it.

iirc, microtype has in effect taken over from pdfcprot (it appeared
around the same as the last release of pdfcprot in 2004).

certainly microtype is the only one under active maintenance, just
now.   (and it's got a better name -- not hinting that it's a pdf-only
package...)