Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release

To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 15:46:16 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ac8t6nkn.fsf@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 8664jic747.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> ( Frank Küster's message of "Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:32:56 +0200")
References: <200605302123.k4ULNC428990@f7.net> <1149110563.11032.29.camel@atlantis.mpeters.local> <867j41nwu7.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <1149241505.2615.7.camel@atlantis.mpeters.local> <44800FD0.6060303@oucs.ox.ac.uk> <1149247257.2615.21.camel@atlantis.mpeters.local> <87slmnbw17.fsf@florent.maison> <85pshr92i2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8764jj3ap4.fsf@florent.maison> <874pz2jili.fsf@florent.maison> <85odxa2ndz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87u07281fg.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 8664jic747.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>

Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch> wrote:

> Stefan Ullrich once said that he didn't recommend lesstiff because of
> the problems.  But looking at LESSTIF-BUGS it seems to me as if lesstiff
> should work well unless one is using expert mode.  So giving the user

And guess what, I am using expert mode. :-/

> the choice might be a good idea.  We could try to provide a binary
> linked to lesstiff, both managed with update-alternatives.

Well, yes. Volonteers? :)

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: [tex-live] Proposal for collection reorganization
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for collection reorganization
Previous by thread: Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release
Next by thread: Re: [tex-live] teTeX: no next release
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread