Bug#367261: Acknowledgement (listings-style fails to continue counting correctly)

[Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>]

Hi,

Some futher information: One empty line is "a feature, not a bug"®
according to the docs, but it seems that the use of \lstinline
interferes with the counting. see attached minimal working example.

Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[german]{babel}
\usepackage{listings}

\begin{document}

\lstset{numbers=left, firstnumber=last}

\begin{lstlisting}
rueber    (x,y) = (x+1,y)
runter    (x,y) = (x,y+1)
ruerunter (x,y) = (x+1,y+1)
hoch      (x,y) = (x,y-1)
links     (x,y) = (x-1,y)

\end{lstlisting}

Maybe the problem is the use of lstinline in  \lstinline.doeach. as one empty line is documented, but several should not be needed. But it seems that every \lstinline-lstinline- reduces the count\ldots
\begin{lstlisting}
doeach f []      = []
doeach f (x:xs)  = ((f x):xs) : (map (x:) (doeach f xs))
\end{lstlisting}

\end{document}