Re: NMU of dvipdfmx
From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Subject: Re: NMU of dvipdfmx
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:18:17 +0100
> > I understand that he can't normally maintain dvipdfmx before
> > April so NMU is no problem.
>
> So be it. Can one of the DDs check the package on tug.org, as said, no
> serious changes but the addition of texlive as dependency.
Does someone do already? If not I'm willing to do it.
However, as I said already, the most serious problem
caused by one of NMUs was
> BTW, there is messing up in dvipdfmx. Wnen Yu maintained
> it there was 50dvipdfmx.cnf but now 80DVIPDFMx.cnf instead.
> (contents of 80DVIPDFMx.cnf seemed better, though)
> I don't know which NMU installed 80DVIPDFMx.cnf but it is
> very bad states now.
and it will be better if it could be fixed before Guanghui
will come back again. But, Guanghui, your statement
From: "Guanghui Yu" <yu.guanghui@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#353584: NMU of dvipdfmx
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:19:30 +0800
> Thanks for the NMUs. I'm sorry that I was almost inactive for about one year
> because of personal reason. After April, I can normally maintain the
> packages.
is a bit ambiguous, I think. It will be great help for us
if you explicitly permit us to do NMU untill you will come
back again.
Regards, 2006-3-6(Mon)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: