Re: tetex-doc-nonfree
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@web.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 19:47 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> the package in the repository contains the context documentation only,
>> but it builds and installs fine. I think we should upload it rather
>> sooner than later, so that we don't depend on NEW processing (fast
>> though it seems to be).
>>
>> Comments?
>
> No comment, besides that it sounds reasonable, but a question. Do you
> want to upload a new version of tetex-{base,doc,extra} without these
> non-free files, which would close #345604 (or at least lower its
> severity)? Or do you want to wait till the packages have migrated to
> testing?
The latter, tetex-doc-nonfree declares "Replaces: tetex-doc (<=3.0-13).
> Or is #345604 the reason, why the packages don't migrate to
> testing?
I don't know; I'll contact the release team again.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: