Bug#345604: contains non-free documentation
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[GFDL, OpenPub, ...]
> I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to
> contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once
> we know about a DFSG-free documentation license, in other words,
> hopefully once the revised CC licenses are released.
ACK. As long only licenses meant for programs are known DFSG free, there
is no point asking authors to change licenses.
cheerio
ralf
Reply to: