Bug#334723: marked as done (tetex-base: Please purge unneeded debconf questions)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
with message-id <E1EyqFC-0004xG-6s@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#334723: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 14:23:33 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Wed Oct 19 07:23:33 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.127.100]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESEqr-0003PI-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:23:33 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166])
by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9JENVqr028210
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:23:31 +0200
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ESEqp-0006rg-1h
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:23:31 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: Please purge unneeded debconf questions
X-Debbugs-CC: Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:23:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87u0fdd1r1.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-8
Severity: normal
-- debconf information:
tetex-base/olddat: true
tetex-base/fmtutil-failed:
[...]
tetex-base/oldupdm:
tetex-base/updmap-failed:
most are obsolete
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334723-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 12:50:43 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jan 17 04:50:43 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EyqFC-0004xG-6s; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 334723-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#334723: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-12
Message-Id: <E1EyqFC-0004xG-6s@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 3.0-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 334723@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:14:15 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 321257 321804 334723 343572 344212 347355
Changes:
tetex-base (3.0-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* add magic comment to language.d/00tetex.cnf [preining]
* tetex-extra now depends on tetex-base (>= 3.0-11), in order to prevent
partial upgrades with tetex-extra's files already in TEXMFDIST without
tetex-base and tex-common being updated appropriately (closes:
#343572) [frank]
* Add two missing md5sums to the list in common.functions (closes:
#344212) [frank]
* Bump standards-version to 3.6.2 (no changes needed except the
still outstanding fixes for #139353) [frank]
* When handling obsolete conffiles, also cater for files from woody,
necessary if tetex-extra has been in state rc throughout sarge
(closes: #347355) [frank]
* Again add the watchfile which was lost in sid; update it's syntax a
little. [frank]
* Do not keep a copy of the static language.dat if it is the version
shipped with woody or sarge (closes: #321804) [frank]
* Don't claim to remove unchanged conffiles if no conffiles are on the
system at all [frank]
* Unregister obsolete debconf questions (closes: #334723) [frank]
* Document in NEWS.Debian that we cannot migrate user's changes from old
00updmap.cfg to 10tetex-base.cfg and 10tetex-extra.cfg (closes:
#321257) [frank]
* Do not let the preinst fail just because the previously installed
version is pre-sarge, as we did deliberately during experimental
development.
* Fix reportbug script handling [preining]
Files:
985a346e1dfdd98974263f8548e3d6d6 794 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
e3528e0ad2e1ea7643f8a11f59342858 343752 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
a024a4aa596534627da720bf03da533b 22396298 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
bcc5ea507fc7edadeb2f96ba1afa2429 10823270 tex optional tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
ef369e0c24a10e2b933ba26380da6054 50142848 doc optional tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzOWE+xs9YyJS+hoRAkd6AJ9kTjKrEWKokQkOfKyEOLQC5yAhAwCeM23V
uB41Emhh0nxDjTnvkYM7DKw=
=KKv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: