[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)



Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

> On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System (owner@bugs.debian.org) wrote:
>> According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept
>> woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge
>> versions - in other words it is not a bug, and I'm closing it.
>> 
> Correct me, if I'm wrong: IIRC the default answer for "Your config
> file was changed by you or by a script: what do you want to do?" Is:
> "keep the manually crafted config file" So this is not really a user
> error, IMHO. That was one reason, why I had trouble during woody ->
> sarge upgrade.

It's still the user's responsibility to check for problems with changed
conffiles before reporting a bug. 

But you are right, Hilmar, a package should care for this, and tetex
*does*.  We have extra code in the postinst to force /var/lib/texmf into
TEXMF.  Strange that it didn't work for Robert.

Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed
it? 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Reply to: