Bug#325516: Buggy BTS? Why is this filed as "absent bug"? (was: Bug#325516: marked as done (booktabs.sty: spurious vspace with multiple cmidrules))
owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:21:32 +0200
> with message-id <87irxpjgqb.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
> and subject line Bug#325516: booktabs.sty: spurious vspace with multiple cmidrules
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
[...]
> From: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Subject: booktabs.sty: spurious vspace with multiple cmidrules
[...]
> Package: tetex-extra
> Version: 2.0.2c-8
> Severity: normal
> File: booktabs.sty
[...]
> To: Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org>
> Cc: 325516-done@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#325516: booktabs.sty: spurious vspace with multiple
> cmidrules
[...]
> Version: 3.0-7
>
> Falk Hueffner <falk@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> the two cmidrules do not line up properly, the right one is set below
>> the left one by about its width, contradicting the documentation (you
>> need to zoom a bit to see it).
>
> Indeed, thanks for reporting. The author of booktabs must have noticed
> that already, because in the current version it is fixed. This version
> is already available as a Debian package in experimental [...]
So the facts are that the bug exists in 2.0.2c-8, but is fixed in 3.0-7
in experimental. So why is the bug shown as one of the "Absent bugs",
and marked as "Will be archived in 28 days", together with an other bug
that indeed was only reported against the experimental version?
Did I something wrong, or is there a bug in the version handling of the
BTS?
TIA, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: