Bug#302301: marked as done (tetex-extra: letterspacing.sty missing)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:44:22 +0200
with message-id <87oed0kxw9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Bug#302301: tetex-extra: letterspacing.sty missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 05:57:37 +0000
>From James.Hirschorn@logic.univie.ac.at Wed Mar 30 21:57:37 2005
Return-path: <James.Hirschorn@logic.univie.ac.at>
Received: from (CH.home.canada) [133.30.117.143]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGsgT-000564-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:57:37 -0800
Received: from hirschor by CH.home.canada with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DGsee-0002cA-DW; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:55:44 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Hirschorn <James.Hirschorn@logic.univie.ac.at>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: letterspacing.sty missing
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:55:44 +0900
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DGsee-0002cA-DW@CH.home.canada>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-7
Severity: normal
Shouldn't it be in tetex?
Thanks,
James
-- Package-specific info:
Please read and follow the instructions in the first lines below
the text: "-- Package-specific info:".
Thank you.
Press ENTER to continue
If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries
(latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong
output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the
error in your report. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of
other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps
to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures!
If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of
output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem),
you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that
can be found at
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini-en.html (english)
or
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini.html (german)
##################################
minimal input file
##################################
other files
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 79 Mar 31 14:47 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 91 Mar 31 14:47 /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root users 834 Mar 31 14:47 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Mar 31 14:17 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-20041004
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11-0.1 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii tetex-base 2.0.2c-7 Basic library files of teTeX
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files
ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302301-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 08:44:27 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Thu Mar 31 00:44:27 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.68.106]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGvHu-00083b-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:44:26 -0800
Received: from alhambra.kuesterei.ch ([130.60.169.112])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j2V8iNTB023225;
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:44:23 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch)
by alhambra.kuesterei.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DGvHr-0002Ho-MN; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:44:23 +0200
To: James Hirschorn <James.Hirschorn@kurt.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp>
Cc: 302301-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#302301: tetex-extra: letterspacing.sty missing
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
In-Reply-To: <200503311719.11001.James.Hirschorn@kurt.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> (James
Hirschorn's message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:19:10 +0900")
References: <[🔎] E1DGsee-0002cA-DW@CH.home.canada>
<[🔎] 87acokmfb5.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
<[🔎] 873bucme7h.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
<200503311719.11001.James.Hirschorn@kurt.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:44:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87oed0kxw9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 302301-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
James Hirschorn <James.Hirschorn@kurt.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2005 17:06, you wrote:
>> Frank K=FCster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
>> > The author of letterspacing.sty is notoriously reluctant to add a
>> > DFSG-free license statement to his files, thus allowing distribution by
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> > Debian (and TeX-live etc.).
>>
>> This should have been: "which would allow". Without it, we cannot
>> distribute it.
>
> I understand. I had an old latex file I needed to process, so I used=20
> letterspacing.tex from CTAN.
Sorry for the inconvenience - but the blame is on letterspacing's
author. I'm closing, since we cannot do anything about it - do you
agree?=20
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Reply to: