Bug#300130: tetex-extra: Bad Erlang language definition in lstlang3.sty
On 21.03.05 KatolaZ (me@katolaz.homeunix.net) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > Thanks for the good bug report! As the bug still can be found in
> > latest upstream (teTeX 3.0), I'll check the latest listings
> > package ASAP and forward that bug to Carsten if still present.
> > Unfortunately I don't speak Erlang so I can't check that bug for
> > correctness. Can you assure, that the patch doesn't have unwanted
> > side effects?
>
> Yes. The patch does not regard Erlang itself, but the way a
> language is defined into the LaTeX "listing" package. Without this
> patch, it is not possible to compile any .tex file which uses
> listing with language set to "erlang".
>
Thanks for explanation. So the real mininmal example didn't really
need the code lines, but rather a begin and an end of the lstlisting
env. You just wanted to show us, what the effect of that bug is.
Thanks!
> [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ ---- LUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
>
Greetings to Sicilia. Is the rainy season already over?
Hilmar
--
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: