[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)



Hi!

Frank Küster [2005-03-22 12:49 +0100]:
> Martin, good to hear that.  Did you also read the other messages in this
> thread, namely Hamish's confusion about CAN-2004-0888 vs. CAN-2004-0889?

He is certainly not the only one who is confused about these. All
patches that I ever saw fix both CANs, and the description of both
CANs are nearly identical. I really don't know which particular fix
belongs to which CAN.

> And, by the way, why didn't you answer to the bug, or the security
> list(s)? 

Hmm, I replied to 300182-submitter@bugs.debian.org and I can see my
reply at

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300182

Didn't you get this mail? If not, I shall probably reply to
nnn@bugs.d.o in addition, but I thought this would happen
automatically.

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt               http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer    http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer         http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: