Bug#298257: marked as done (tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100
with message-id <87is3zq3z4.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-1 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 03:20:14 +0000
>From kmuto@debian.org Sat Mar 05 19:20:13 2005
Return-path: <kmuto@debian.org>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7mJR-000842-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:20:13 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62248223041
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 15706-04 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unicorn.kmuto.org [192.168.0.15])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08F322303F
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A83672AF1FC; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20050306032011.A83672AF1FC@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: kmuto@kmuto.org rewritten as kmuto@debian.org
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue.
As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2.
Unfortunatelly build process looked go infinite loop.
test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables && \
test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables && \
touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \
sed -e 's@.*[[:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./.*@\1@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true
test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in && \
test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in && \
touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \
sed -e 's@.*[[:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./.*@\1@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true
eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in
test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables && \
test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables && \
touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \
sed -e 's@.*[[:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./.*@\1@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true
test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in && \
test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in && \
touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \
sed -e 's@.*[[:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./.*@\1@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true
eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in
...
Full log (before I killed) is:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=tetex-bin&ver=2.99.12.20050203-beta-1&arch=arm&stamp=1110038196&file=log&as=raw
Hmm, Is this buildd's time problem? buildd is working with UTC clock.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
kmuto@debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298257-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 08:50:43 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Thu Mar 10 00:50:42 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.68.106]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9JNS-00046F-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:50:42 -0800
Received: from alhambra.kuesterei.ch ([130.60.169.112])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j2A8ode4002828;
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch)
by alhambra.kuesterei.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1D9JNP-0000rk-Cu; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100
To: 298257-done@bugs.debian.org, 298315-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-1 to experimental
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] handler.s.C.111032240526880.transcript@bugs.debian.org> (Debian
Bug Tracking System's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:03:09 -0800")
References: <[🔎] E1D8nUu-0001nT-00@newraff.debian.org>
<[🔎] handler.s.C.111032240526880.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100
Message-ID: <87is3zq3z4.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 298257-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) schrieb:
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> tag 298257 + fixed-in-experimental
> Bug#298257: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?
> Tags were: experimental
> Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
>
>> tag 298315 + fixed-in-experimental
> Bug#298315: tetex-bin: Fails to install
> Tags were: experimental
> Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
Since these bugs only existed in experimental, they can be closed after
this upload.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Reply to: