Processed: Re: Processed: adding some tags

To: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Cc: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>(tetex-base #219573 #57367)
Subject: Processed: Re: Processed: adding some tags
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:18:23 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.110572585819824.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87acrbdh3u.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
References: <[🔎] 87acrbdh3u.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # correcting my error
> tags 219573 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#219573: tetex-base: class a0poster belongs to THIS package, not tetex-src
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental

> # no, I didn't mean that
> tags 57367 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#57367: generate helpindex files during package build, or even in postinst
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Processed: adding some tags
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Processed: adding some tags
Next by Date: Bug#288182: Why do we not reset IFS? (was: Bug#288182: tetex-bin postinst fails when calling fmtutil)
Previous by thread: Re: Processed: adding some tags
Next by thread: CVS frank tetex-base: some redactory edits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread