Re: Mess with CVS
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
> On 29.12.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
>> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > I will have to go back to the last tagged versions (2.0.2-24 and
>> > 2.0.2c-3, respectively) and restore the changes since then by hand.
>>
>> I have done this now, and brought back the changes to HEAD, that means:
>> HEAD is now again 2.0.2 or unstable, and if you do
>>
>> cvs update -A
>>
>> in your working copy (if necessary with -d -P) you get (back) to
>> 2.0.2, both with tetex-base and tetex-bin. The beta versions can
>> still be retrieved from the experimental branch
>>
> Means: nothing has changed in respect to what was written in the
> Readme.Debian how to check out, but one can retrieve the source packages
> for pre-teTeX 3.0 by using the -r switch?
Yes. I'm not sure currently whether you'll get empty directories
(i.e. dirs with only subdirs and CVS files in them) in tetex-base. In
this case use "cvs update -d -P", and they'll go away.
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: