Bug#336019: marked as done (tetex-base: Install fails for update-language)
Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:40:52 +0100
with message-id <20051208184052.GD2492@preusse>
and subject line Bug#336019: tetex-base: Install fails for update-language
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 12:43:02 +0000
>From piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de Thu Oct 27 05:43:02 2005
Return-path: <piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EV75y-0006lT-00; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:43:02 -0700
Received: from kosh (kosh.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.23.210])
by mail.informatik.hu-berlin.de (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10) with ESMTP id j9RCgSw4024386
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:42:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from piefel by kosh with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EV75G-0008UZ-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:42:18 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Piefel <piefel@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: Install fails for update-language
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:42:18 +0200
Message-Id: <E1EV75G-0008UZ-00@kosh>
Sender: Michael Piefel <piefel@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-Virus-Status: No (mail)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal
Fresh install fails in postinst with:
update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
-- Package-specific info:
Please read and follow the instructions in the first lines below
the text: "-- Package-specific info:".
Thank you.
Press ENTER to continue
If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries
(latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong
output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the
error in your report. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of
other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps
to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures!
If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of
output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem),
you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that
can be found at
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini-en.html (english)
or
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini.html (german)
##################################
minimal input file
##################################
other files
######################################
List of ls-R files
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii tex-common 0.8 Common infrastructure for using an
ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages tetex-base recommends:
ii tetex-doc 3.0-10 The documentation component of the
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.15 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-3 GCC support library
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkpathsea4 3.0-10.1 path search library for teTeX (run
ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libt1-5 5.1.0-2 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw8 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxmu6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System printing extension
ii libxpm4 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X pixmap library
ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii mime-support 3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii perl 5.8.7-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sed 4.1.4-4 The GNU sed stream editor
ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
pn tetex-bin <none> (no description available)
ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336019-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 18:41:26 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Thu Dec 08 10:41:26 2005
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp05.web.de ([217.72.192.209])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkQhq-0006kd-KC
for 336019-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:41:26 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #340)
id 1EkQhL-0002RI-00
for 336019-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:40:55 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:40:52 +0100
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:40:52 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 336019-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#336019: tetex-base: Install fails for update-language
Message-ID: <20051208184052.GD2492@preusse>
References: <E1EV75G-0008UZ-00@kosh> <20051027150725.GA30294@thinkpad> <1130489005.6416.11.camel@kosh> <87hdb2ngfg.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 20051204223840.GA3004@preusse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20051204223840.GA3004@preusse>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 04.12.05 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
> On 28.10.05 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> > Michael Piefel <piefel@debian.org> wrote:
Hi *,
> > > It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have
> > > at least hinted at the existence of tex-common.
> >
> > Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by
> > that. Moreover there might be also other packages that install
> > files in /etc/texmf, but do not depend on tetex-base or
> > tex-common (e.g. because they only Recommend or Suggest it).
> >
> > You should never remove any files or directories in the realm of
> > dpkg unless you know what you are doing. And "knowing" also
> > involves bringing yourself up-to-date, or running
> >
> > dlocate $directory_I_plan_to_remove
> >
> Are these explanations sufficient. Can we close that bug now?
>
I've got an answer from the submitter. He agreed. Closing.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: