Bug#335055: marked as done (tetex-bin: Uninstallable: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
with message-id <864q5k6fc7.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 17:51:41 +0000
>From kurt@roeckx.be Fri Oct 21 10:51:41 2005
Return-path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ET13N-00023b-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:51:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EBC7381E4
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:51:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9A838134
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:51:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id F271526136; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:51:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:51:39 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin: Uninstallable: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory
Message-ID: <20051021175139.GA23902@roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: grave
Hi,
Your package is failing to install if it's not installed yet:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10) ...
rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or
directory
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I'm also seeing problems on upgrades, but the errors are ussually
of my screen by the time I look at them, and when trying it again
they're succesful. I can only assume they're related.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 16:28:44 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Wed Dec 07 08:28:43 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch ([130.60.127.101])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek29r-0004Rz-8j; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:28:43 -0800
Received: from localhost ([130.60.169.219])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id jB7GSeI2006996;
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:28:41 +0100
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek2AL-0000Vz-HL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:13 +0100
To: 332562-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 332562-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on
debian-reference)
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 86lkyw6hq9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> (
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:37:34
+0100")
References: <E1Ek0L5-0000IR-MW@spohr.debian.org>
<20051006161152.GA3728@localhost.localdomain>
<[🔎] handler.332562.D335055.11339664733557.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
<[🔎] 86lkyw6hq9.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
Message-ID: <864q5k6fc7.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Frank K=FCster <frank@kuesterei.ch> wrote:
> reopen 332562
> stop
>
> owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
>> Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
>> with message-id <E1Ek0L5-0000IR-MW@spohr.debian.org>
>> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
>> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
> I have no idea why katie closes a bug in debian-reference when I upload
> a new version of tetex-bin, especially given that the bug number 332562
> does not appear in the changes file:
>
>> Closes: 207874 335055 335477 336092 337308 338986 339388 341940 342292
>
> Does anybody have a clue?
Of course - it was merged, and I mixed it up with the other
debian-reference bug.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Reply to: