[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#338689: tex-common tells me /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg changed



Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> wrote:

> Package: tex-common
> Version: 0.10
>
> tex-common seems to ask for verification on 
> file change.
> I suppose it's meant to be fixed in 0.10, but it's apparently not.

It seems as if you (or some script?) has changed the setting for
dvipsDownloadBase14; this setting is also false in sarge and etch, but
it doesn't show up in the diff.

> Inst tetex-extra [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) []
> Inst libkpathsea4 (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) []
> Remv tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx tetex-bin pgf ]
> Inst tetex-bin [2.0.2-31] (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx pgf texinfo ]
> Inst tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [texinfo ]
> Inst tex-common (0.10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable)

I don't know where these lines are from, and how to interpret them.
Does that mean that you just installed tetex-base before trying the
upgrade?  Where there conffiles of tetex-base on the system before that? 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Reply to: