Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed

To: "Szabo Peter" <szabo.peter@szszi.hu>
Cc: Debian-teTeX-maint <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:31:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r79quew8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051109124028.M20676@szszi.hu> (Szabo Peter's message of "Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:41:05 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20051109124028.M20676@szszi.hu>

"Szabo Peter" <szabo.peter@szszi.hu> wrote:

> Yes, that's my GPG key.
> Sure, anybody can use pfb2t1c and t1c2pfb under the GPL.

Why do I get a "BAD signature" message for this mail?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
  - From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

References:
- Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
  - From: "Szabo Peter" <szabo.peter@szszi.hu>

Prev by Date: Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
Next by Date: SVN tetex commit: r324 - in tex-common/trunk/debian: . po
Previous by thread: Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
Next by thread: Re: License of pfb2t1c & t1c2pfb reviewed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread